chhaupadi

"Nepal's 'confined women' want change"
(from the BBC)

I used this article for discussion in my classes on Thursday. It’s about the practice, in Nepal, of isolating women and their babies for the first 11 days after childbirth. Not all students were against it, making for an interesting discussion. It does sound harmless initially. As one student pointed out, maybe it’s good that the baby is not exposed to all the germs, bacteria and viruses carried in the outside world by other people. However, this means that these women and children do not receive medical care if they fall ill. The mothers are not allowed to eat normal, nutritious food like lentils and meat, forgoing the protein and iron that they surely need after childbirth. Finally, the two are typically kept in isolation in an unsanitary, dark, dank place with animals, such as a cow shed.

Depressingly, one student noted that even though the women in the article are upset, it only lasts for 11 days. Surely she will remember her experience when it comes time to force her daughter to do the same, but the pressure of tradition will overrule and the cycle continues. Many of our families still practice these things, the students noted, even though many of us are sitting here thinking they should not.

Apparently rules like this apply to menstruation, too. And they are found across religions—my Hindu, Muslim and Buddhist students all compared similar restrictions. Frequently, women are not allowed in places of worship while they are menstruating because they are not “pure” in this condition. There’s a temple in India where no women are allowed to go from the age of 8 to 60. Why, asked one student, are we pushed away from God while in a condition God created for us? On a more uplifting note, one student made the very good point that while these rules are followed in the name of God, they are not written by God. There is no evidence of them in any holy book. They are created completely by society and therefore can be changed by society, too!